Drum Smoking Big Poppa Smokers

gracehudditon

12 Angry Men

Rate this Entry
The film presents the decision-making process for a murder trial, which involves twelve jurors. It keeps track of the changing perception of the jurorsí mind concerning the case verdict. It commences with the conclusion of the courtís session and the retiring of the twelve jurors into their room in order to present a unanimous verdict based on evidence and witnessí statements. Therefore, the setting of this film is the court, more specifically a special room where the jurors convene and deliver their verdict. The film involves several characters, both active and passive, who represent different power structures. A more detailed analysis of the film see on writing elites.
The foreman is a significant character within the film, because he operates as the principal juror and leads all the activities within the jury room. The foreman delivers the verdict for the murder trial, but he lacks additional power over other jurors. He coordinates the activities of the jury team although he makes an equal contribution to the trial verdict. The foreman becomes the seventh person to change the verdict. He also coaches a high school team within Queens. His position within the jury and high school team awards him power but with limitations.
The second juror demonstrates signs of nervousness and anxiety throughout the proceedings regarding his responsibilities, because he serves for the first time during this trial. He changes the votes of the fourth and the sixth jurors. The second juror exhibits a sense of powerlessness, because he lacks judicial experience as well as the confidence to deliver plausible arguments. The third juror is married and has a troubled relationship with his twenty-year old son. He operates a messenger service. The juror reveals his aggressive and confident nature throughout the proceedings. He describes the case as clear-cut and argues against the opinion of the eighth juror. This juror reflects a sense of power in expressing case arguments although he finally sees reason in the argument of the eighth juror.
The fourth juror, who is a broker in real life, alters his vote as the second-last person. The juror bears the conviction of his moral, physical, and intellectual power throughout the proceedings; however, he later realizes his imperfections and accepts the not guilty verdict. The fifth juror alters his vote as the second person during the proceedings. The film reveals that the juror supported Milwaukee baseball team and emerged from a slum. However, the jurorís current occupation is nursing at Harlem Hospital. This juror exhibits a sense of social inferiority, which reflects powerlessness against other juror and undermines his expression within the room. The sixth juror, a house painter, changes the trialís vote together with the second juror. He does not display his power as a juror but rather views himself more as a follower than an equal contributor. The seventh juror, the marmalade salesman, exhibited the attributes of cynicism, selfishness, and indifference. The seventh juror utters ďI donít care, itís all the same thing!Ē. The quote reinforces his character and the cynical expression of his argument. He also expresses attempts to discover the truth, to be a soft sell, which demonstrates his indifferent nature. His belief in arriving at a socially acceptable verdict instead of the truth reflects his powerlessness and inability to affect decisions as a juror. He is agnostic although this makes him tough to change. He focuses more on his personal hedonistic desires instead of the proceedings of the murder trial.
The eighth juror, who is married and has two children, expresses the first proceedings vote for the defendant as not guilty after noting the testimonial inconsistencies from the prosecution. The juror is calm, rational, and confident about his position, which makes him successful in persuading the rest of the jurors about the not guilty plea. The eighth juror emerges as an influential person with the greatest power within the jury room being able to influence the opinions of twelve jurors. The ninth juror is an older man with an injudicious push for actualized existence and self-worth. He the old age knowledge and understanding to reach his resolve and support the eighth juror. The power of the ninth juror impacts the decision of other jurors, for instance, the twelfth one who settles on the not guilty plea after listening to the old-aged juror.
The tenth juror shows assertiveness and confidence in the manner he expresses his arguments. He operates a garage as his daily livelihood and changes the vote as the eighth person. The tenth juror first comes out with power, but his authority ends after the exposure to deep shame, which sends him speechless. The eleventh juror originates from Germany and makes watches. He portrays an articulate and intelligent character despite having experienced mental stagnation earlier in life. The juror presents strong arguments and finally changes the verdict. The arguments reflect his capacity to influence decision-making within the jury room. The twelfth and final juror is humorous and unable to focus. He changes the proceedings vote severally and settles for the not guilty plea after the intelligent input from the old man. The juror lacks authority and power to influence others, because he relies on persuasion from another more experienced juror despite having a similar opportunity to influence the verdict.
The twelve jurors have the same authority, although the foreman coordinates jury room proceedings and bears the power to present the verdict to the court. As a leader and overseer of the proceedings, the foreman assumes the position of a follower, because the verdict must come from the majority. Therefore, despite having the leadership and contributory skills, he takes the most popular verdict. Therefore, the foreman assumes a passive character that may see the truth, but still waits for its acknowledgement from the other jurors. The contributions of all the jurors receive the same level of support as long as they agreed on a unanimous verdict.

Submit "12 Angry Men" to Digg Submit "12 Angry Men" to del.icio.us Submit "12 Angry Men" to StumbleUpon Submit "12 Angry Men" to Google

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags
Categories
Uncategorized

Comments